[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shepherd -> guile 2.2?
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: shepherd -> guile 2.2? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2017 12:45:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue 16 May 2017 10:42, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> ;;; WARNING: compilation of
> /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild failed:
> ;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file
> "/gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild"
This is because the build does not set XDG_CACHE_HOME. See:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00939.html
> Some deprecated features have been used. Set the environment
> variable GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED to "detailed" and rerun the
> program to get more information. Set it to "no" to suppress
> this message.
Here you will get more info if you set the
GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED=detailed variable.
> shepherd/support.scm:209:2: warning: non-literal format string
Not a deal-breaker; worth having a look at though.
> shepherd/runlevel.scm:106:6: warning: possibly unbound variable
> `next-services'
Something to look into.
> shepherd/service.scm:606:8: warning: possibly unbound variable `apply-to-args'
Replace with "apply".
> And lastly: should we keep a guile-2.0 variant of the shepherd, or is it
> fine to push this tiny change?
I would say don't bother keeping it.
Andy