[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What’s next?
From: |
Chris Marusich |
Subject: |
Re: What’s next? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2017 07:57:41 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> So, I use and recommend `guix pull`!
I use it too. Statements by others in this thread that "nobody" uses it
or that "everyone" is using Git are mistaken.
I use Git when I want to hack on Guix. Otherwise, I use 'guix pull'.
IMO, the biggest problem with 'guix pull' is that there is no easy
rollback. I can live with long execution times (--fallback is fine, but
it'd be nice if substitutes were available more often), and I can live
with 'guix pull' causing me to get a version of guix that's broken
somehow, but the inability to easily roll back when things go south
makes me hesitant to run 'guix pull' regularly.
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: What???s next?, (continued)
- Re: What???s next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/27
- Re: What's next?, Pjotr Prins, 2017/05/28
- Re: What's next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/28
- Re: What's next?, Roel Janssen, 2017/05/28
- Re: What's next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/30
- Re: What's next?, Pjotr Prins, 2017/05/30
- Re: What's next?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/05/28
- Re: What???s next?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/05/28
- Re: What???s next?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/05/28
- Re: What???s next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/30
- Re: What’s next?,
Chris Marusich <=
- Re: What’s next?, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/25
- Re: What’s next?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/05/25
- Re: What’s next?, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/05/25
- Re: What’s next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/27
- Re: What’s next?, myglc2, 2017/05/29
Re: What’s next?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/27