Re: Packaging mathjax and other javascript libraries

[Pjotr Prins]

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:30:25PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
> There are so many javascript libraries out there -- mathjax, d3.js,
> jquery, etc, etc. Packaging them would be extremely useful for
> self-hosting. But, we need to agree on good practices, so that we don't
> run into trouble later.

Good timing. I have been using $PROFILE/lib/javascript/ to store
modules in line with python and ruby etc. Splitting out pure JS
modules and webapps makes sense to me. We also have clojurescript,
purescript, elm and others to consider - even if they generate JS. Is
JS going to be our object format?

--