[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What’s next?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: What’s next? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 May 2017 12:01:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> Here are some other annoyances:
>
> * the verbosity of reporting hash mismatches. You posted a neat little
> change for that some time ago, but I cannot find it any more.
Oh right, see attached.
> * texlive. I’m working on splitting the package up. (An aggressive
> firewall at work put a stop to that work, but I’ll try to resume very
> soon.)
Good point! Looking forward to that.
> * very explicit but cryptic stack traces. I think that all errors
> should be reported more nicely. The error can still be printed (on
> demand?), but Guix probably should not spill its innards too readily.
I agree with this direction, but we’ll have to work on concrete cases
here. Bug reports of the form “when I do this I get a stack trace
instead of an error message” are welcome!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Re: What’s next?, Brendan Tildesley, 2017/05/24
Re: What’s next?, Catonano, 2017/05/24
Re: What’s next?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/05/24