[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2017 16:47:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) |
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 08:38:58PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Here are patches that allow you build groff, cairo, and cups with the
> > Artifex Ghostscript.
>
> Woo!
I'm not sure what I was thinking... I forgot to actually make groff,
cairo, and cups use this artifex-ghostscript :p
Testing now...
> > + (patches (search-patches "artifex-ghostscript-runpath.patch"
> > + ;; TODO:
> > + ;;"ghostscript-CVE-2017-8291.patch"
> > + ))
>
> What’s up with this? Is the latest release of Artifex Ghostscript
> vulnerable?
Yes, it's vulnerable. I saw this fixed in the Arch Linux package, but I
didn't check yet if there are other important bugs to fix in Ghostscript
9.21.
> Couldn’t we just add “#:make-flags '("so")” and avoid replacing the
> build phase?
I'll try this.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/20
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Marius Bakke, 2017/05/20
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/05/21
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/23
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/29
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/29
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/05/29
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/29
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Mark H Weaver, 2017/05/29
- Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript, Leo Famulari, 2017/05/30