Re: 02/02: gnu: Add s.

[ng0]

Mark H Weaver transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> address@hidden (Kei Kebreau) writes:
> 
> > kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository guix.
> >
> > commit 0e4591bb696a36bc83f75869dd2711987b17b722
> > Author: ng0 <address@hidden>
> > Date:   Tue May 16 22:28:58 2017 +0000
> >
> >     gnu: Add s.
> >     
> >     * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s): New variable.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Kei Kebreau <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/shells.scm | 61 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/shells.scm b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> > index 5eeb186..5e04e86 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> > @@ -503,6 +503,67 @@ Its features include:
> >  @end enumerate\n")
> >      (license bsd-2)))
> >  
> > +(define-public s
> > +  (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c")
> > +        (revision "1"))
> > +    (package
> > +      (name "s")
> > +      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit 
> > 7)))
> 
> I think we should rename this package and variable name to 's-shell' or
> something along those lines.  's' is commonly used as a local variable
> name.  Single character variable names are in short supply, and I don't
> think we should allocate them to packages.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
>       Mark

I did not think of this use, renaming to s-shell is okay.

-- 
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature