[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden
|
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden |
|
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:59:22 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:47:41PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I forgot to mention:
>>
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> > I'd hate to "strand" existing users who might not notice that they are
>> > not receiving updates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified in
>> > their GuixSD configuration.
>>
>> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
>> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
>
> Ah, right. I was thinking of `guix package -u .` for out-of-tree packages.
Thanks for reminding me about this issue with "guix package -u".
I just filed a bug about this:
https://bugs.gnu.org/27261
Mark