[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance on NFS
|
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
|
Subject: |
Re: Performance on NFS |
|
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:59:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> I’m not sure if SMB is faster than NFS, is it? 9p (which Linux
> supports) might work well.
Sadly, our “storage appliances” only offer NFS or SMB (and maybe SCP).
I’d gladly try *anything* to get away from our slow NFS.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
- Re: RPC performance, (continued)
- Re: RPC performance, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/06/22
- Re: RPC performance, Andy Wingo, 2017/06/23
- Re: RPC performance, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/06/23
- Re: RPC performance, Andy Wingo, 2017/06/23
- Re: RPC performance, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/06/26
- Re: RPC performance, Andy Wingo, 2017/06/26
- Re: RPC performance, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/06/19
- Re: RPC performance, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/06/22
- Re: Combining Guix, direnv and Emacs for environment customisation, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/06/07
- Performance on NFS, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/06/07
- Re: Performance on NFS,
Ricardo Wurmus <=