[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
github tarballs problematic?
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
github tarballs problematic? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:35:28 +0000 |
I've just come across this post via https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/861
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/address@hidden/message/UDZ2WKMTOE6J2M4K7PF5OWSSC4BAX2SH/
quote in almost full:
today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees with the
on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing a new pacemaker
update, redownloading "spectool -s 0 pacemaker.spec" of the original (-0.1.rc1,
from 2 weeks ago) spec and comparing the hashes, which (surprisingly to me)
didn't match (they were at any similar test in the past). Then I looked at the
adiff output:
...
diff -ru Unpack-2241/pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1/configure.ac
Unpack-6255/pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1/configure.ac
--- Unpack-2241/pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1/configure.ac2017-05-09
00:55:15.000000000
+0200
+++ Unpack-6255/pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1/configure.ac2017-05-09
00:55:15.000000000
+0200
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@
AC_PATH_PROGS(GIT, git false)
AC_MSG_CHECKING(build version)
-BUILD_VERSION=0459f40
+BUILD_VERSION=0459f40958
if test != ":%h$"; then
AC_MSG_RESULT(archive hash: )
for configure.ac that indeed has export-subst git attribute set and the change
itself arises from "$Format:%h$" substitution. This likely means GitHub was
internally updated to use equivalent of git 2.11 feature of abbreviation length
autoscaling within last 14 days. Hope this will be useful for some (e.g.
fedora-review tool has a check to redownload and diff sources against SRPM
content, IIRC).
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
- github tarballs problematic?,
ng0 <=