[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is font-google-noto toooooo big as a font package?
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: Is font-google-noto toooooo big as a font package? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:43:52 +0000 |
ng0 transcribed 1.9K bytes:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.2K bytes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > tumashu <address@hidden> skribis:
> >
> > > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package easy
> >
> > Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split
> > it, which may not be that simple.
> >
> > Ludo’.
> >
> >
> noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends:
> https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk
> noto itself is offered on the website in many different
> blends aswell:
> https://www.google.com/get/noto/
>
> By the way, this is totally unversioned. Is our only way
> to know that noto has been updated by our package reporting
> a hash missmatch? Looks to me like it is.
> Should we store the fonts somewhere versioned as a fallback?
For noto-cjk debian has some notes:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862276
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature