[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Staging [was Re: core-updates failing packages]
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Staging [was Re: core-updates failing packages] |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:17:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:09:28AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> I was also thinking of updating ruby. Are we planning on merging the staging
> branch before core-updates?
I wasn't aware people were working on the staging branch. If the changes
are not very disruptive, perhaps we could merge it into core-updates.
Otherwise, I'd rather wait.
Also, until we have more powerful hardware running hydra.gnu.org, I
don't think we have the capacity to do staging branches right now.
We are barely able to keep the master branch built, and building
core-updates is frustratingly slow.
To illustrate, I started an evaluation of core-updates ~7 days ago, and
it is still not done building due to the under-powered armhf builders
and the need to juggle resources to build the master branch.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: core-updates summer 2017, (continued)
core-updates failing packages, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/14
Staging [was Re: core-updates failing packages],
Leo Famulari <=
Re: Staging [was Re: core-updates failing packages], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/20
Re: core-updates failing packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/24
Re: core-updates failing packages, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/24
revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Efraim Flashner, 2017/07/26