[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:26:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::*
>> modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I
>> think we should rather find a way to fix them (I spent a bit of time on
>> it but then moved on to something else.)
>
> I've got the Date::* modules building with the attached patch series.
Woow, impressive patch set! At first sight the 26 patches look
reasonable to me, so I would suggest pushing them, along with the
address@hidden update you mentioned.
As for biber itself, perhaps the best option is to make biber-next the
new biber? I don’t use it so I can’t really tell whether there’d be
undesirable consequences.
Another option might be to mass-escape left braces in the Biber code,
but that’s probably not that easy…
Thoughts?
Anyway, this patch series probably closes the main blocker for
core-updates no?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: core-updates failing packages, (continued)
- revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Efraim Flashner, 2017/07/26
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Efraim Flashner, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Efraim Flashner, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/27
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: revert perl-5.26.0 update?, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/30
- core-updates: biber, Leo Famulari, 2017/07/30
- Re: core-updates: biber, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/07/31