Re: Add new package: aspell-dict-pt

[Daniel Pimentel]

I think better 'pt_PT' but maybe it's redundant.
Can I change to pt_PT?

Thanks,

---
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)

On 2017-08-06 22:21, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Daniel Pimentel wrote on 07/08/17 at 02:27:
> > Add new package aspell-dict-pt: gnu/packages/aspell.scm
> Thanks! I went ahead and fixed up the commit message to match our
> conventions (see your previous commit to aspell.scm as pushed by 
> Ludo').
>
> Only one small question: the package uses simply ‘pt’ as the language
> code, while <ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/0index.html> uses
> ‘pt_PT’. Should we follow that example? Or is it needlessly redundant?
>
> I know nothing of the linguistics or politics involved...
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R