[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB EFI installation breakage
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB EFI installation breakage |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:25:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> To reconfigure my system on UEFI, I had to apply this patch:
>>
>> modified gnu/bootloader/grub.scm
>> @@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ submenu \"GNU system, old configurations...\" {~%")
>> ;; root partition.
>> (setenv "GRUB_ENABLE_CRYPTODISK" "y")
>> (unless (zero? (system* grub-install "--boot-directory" install-dir
>> - "--efi-directory" efi-dir))
>> + ;; "--efi-directory" efi-dir
>> + ))
>> (error "failed to install GRUB (EFI)")))))
>>
>>
>> Before that ‘grub-install’ would fail because ‘efi-dir’ would actually
>> be “/dev/sda”, which is what I have in the ‘device’ field of
>> ‘grub-configuration’.
>>
>> Removing the “--efi-directory” solves the problem because ‘grub-install’
>> automatically determines that the EFI directory is mounted at /boot/efi.
>>
>> I think 2941b347b664a3d3114de0ac95e28db78db66144 is bogus because it
>> assumes that the second argument of the gexp’d lambda is ‘efi-dir’,
>> where in fact it is the ‘device’ field of the bootloader config.
>>
>> So what is the preferred fix? Simply remove “--efi-directory” like I
>> did above, and rename ‘efi-dir’ to ‘device’ to avoid the ambiguity?
>> Thoughts?
>
> Maybe we could rename "device" to something like "target" and update the
> documentation to mention that "target" means the _mounted_ EFI System
> Partition for grub-efi, but is typically a block device.
You mean it’s a block device except for EFI, right?
So yes, we can rename ‘device’ to ‘target’, and we should at least
document what you wrote.
> "device" was a no-op for grub-efi anyway since it autodiscovered
> "/boot/efi", at least now we can choose a different location.
Right.
Do you feel like updating the doc and examples? :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.