[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back! |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:51:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.25 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Probably unrelated, but we also have to change the '--enable-kernel'
>> configure flag to say '3.2.0' since that is the minimum supported by
>> glibc 2.26.
>
> Does this mean that binaries built with Guix will need at least Linux
> 3.2.0 to be executed?
I believe so, according to the release notes[0]:
* Linux kernel 3.2 or later is required at runtime, on all architectures
supported by that kernel. (This is a change from version 2.25 only for
x86-32 and x86-64.)
[0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2017-08/msg00000.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- ‘core-updates’ is back!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/08/28
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/29
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Marius Bakke, 2017/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/08/30
- Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!,
Marius Bakke <=
Re: ‘core-updates’ is back!, Andy Wingo, 2017/08/29