Re: Performance issues with using local-file/interned-file/add-to-store

[Ludovic Courtès]

Morning!

Christopher Baines <address@hidden> skribis:

> There does seem to be an intersection between the pipelining
> requirements for computing the store file name, and the potential to
> use that name in working out if the add-to-store even needs to happen.
>
> Maybe computing the store file name for large files, and using that to
> avoid expensive add-to-store calls is a good starting point?

Yes, though we’d have to check whether that really improves performance
since it’d have to read the whole file in order to compute its hash.

Ludo’.