[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really need our own installer?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really need our own installer? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:35:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 |
Hartmut Goebel <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 22.09.2017 um 16:26 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> And last but not least: the installer exists now, which makes the
>> question kinda moot IMO. :-)
>
> The question was more about in which direction will the project go
> further: Continue to develop the current one or build on an existing
> full-featured one. Following the pure tenets or attracting more users by
> compromise.
This is not a binary choice. We can do both.
Since the custom installer already exists and there are people who
continue its development I don’t see why we should give it up.
This will never be a graphical installer, though, so motivated people
are very welcome to explore ways to adapt existing graphical installer
frameworks so that we can use them with Guix.
This is not a question of “purity”.
I for one would like to be able to let people install GuixSD with a
simple graphical installer. Personally, though, I don’t think that’s as
urgent as making GuixSD installable via PXE in managed environments.
Installation makes up only a tiny amount of the lifetime of a GuixSD
system, so in my opinion the project doesn’t really need a large scale
effort on this end.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net