guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 01/01: gnu: red-eclipse: Add store "data" package path as default.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: red-eclipse: Add store "data" package path as default.
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:48:11 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:26:31AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
>>> in repository guix.
>>> 
>>> commit 42abb842f64f5dd7834cabd445a5f4d01f1e68a4
>>> Author: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <address@hidden>
>>> Date:   Sun Aug 20 15:28:20 2017 -0300
>>> 
>>>     gnu: red-eclipse: Add store "data" package path as default.
>>>     
>>>     * gnu/packages/games.scm (red-eclipse): Remove extra spaces. Make 
>>> version
>>>     respect documentation.
>>>     [arguments]: Add "prefix" to make-flags. Add
>>>     "add-store-data-package-path-as-default" phase. Improve "copy-data" 
>>> phase.
>>>     
>>>     Signed-off-by: Kei Kebreau <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  gnu/packages/games.scm | 110 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@
>>>    #:use-module (gnu packages gnuzilla)
>>>    #:use-module (gnu packages icu4c)
>>>    #:use-module (gnu packages networking)
>>> +  #:use-module (guix build utils)
>>>    #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
>>>    #:use-module (guix build-system haskell)
>>>    #:use-module (guix build-system python)
>>
>> This module import created an ambiguous reference to 'which':
>>
>> WARNING: (gnu packages games): `which' imported from both (gnu
>> packages base) and (guix build utils)
>>
>> I don't know if it will be a problem in practice.
>
> It looks like Ludovic took care of this in commit
> db9c49f4999d4e5f6eb0565a6a80892131c55670. Thank you for the
> notification, though.

Right, I had overlooked Leo’s message.

It was indeed a problem in practice, which prevented evaluation:
packages such as ‘crawl-tiles’ were getting the procedure instead of the
package as an input, which is invalid.

Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]