[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tiny Guix (and containers)
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Tiny Guix (and containers) |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:42:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi Ricardo,
Thanks for responding. I think this discussion belongs here.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:02:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 22M 3x53yv4v144c9xp02rs64z7j597kkqax-gcc-5.4.0-lib
>
> According to “du”, this is 32M on my disk. The “lib” subdir contains
> both shared libraries as well as ar archives for static linking;
> together they weigh in at 12MB. We may want to move them to a separate
> output.
Yes, I think that is what we should head for eventually. I vaguely
remember a discussion about this on this ML and people were against
separate outputs for doc, include, static-lib etc. What are you all
thinking now? Does it make sense to have the base package as small as
possible and split out the rest?
I know it is extra work.
> The package also contains lots of header files:
>
> 6.3M
> /gnu/store/3x53yv4v144c9xp02rs64z7j597kkqax-gcc-5.4.0-lib/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.4.0/plugin/include/
>
> Not sure what to do with those without making the use of GCC a hassle.
Yes, that goes with gcc. No point keeping those separate.
> > 41M n6nvxlk2j8ysffjh3jphn1k5silnakh6-glibc-2.25
>
> This package still contains a lot of locale data. The directory
> “share/i18n/locales/” takes up 6.7M, and “share/locale” takes up another
> 4.3M. All the .a files under “lib” take up 8.7M.
>
> > 34M nnykzgwfy8mwh2gmxm715sjxykg8qjwn-binutils-2.28
>
> “share/locale” is 9.4M. This is a cross-cutting concern. We don’t have
> a way to globally filter locales to only requested locales. Even if we
> split them each into a separate output — how would you specify that you
> want the “de_DE” locale in each package and not install the rest?
Yes, it is a specific target discussion. Same goes for compilation
without debug information and optimizing for size. Tiny = tiny.
Ludo wrote at some point that target optimizations are on the roadmap.
It would be rather good to have. Maybe in the form of channels.
> There seems to be some duplication with these directories:
>
>
> /gnu/store/nnykzgwfy8mwh2gmxm715sjxykg8qjwn-binutils-2.28/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
> /gnu/store/nnykzgwfy8mwh2gmxm715sjxykg8qjwn-binutils-2.28/bin/
>
> But the binaries seem to be hardlinked, so they don’t take up extra
> space.
>
> > Now it takes forever to set up the image
>
> Have you tried disabling compression? This could be a lot faster. I
> found that tar with gzip compression is terribly slow to copy things
> from the store into a compressed tar archive. Disabling compression
> speeds this up considerably, even though it is still rather slow.
That will help :). But I was talking about Docker images. Making them
small would be helpful for a lot of people out there. It takes forever
to download and run Docker tests, for example, I hear people complain.
Pj.
Re: Tiny Guix (and containers), Dave Love, 2017/10/31