[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone opposed to GnuTLS with DANE by default?
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone opposed to GnuTLS with DANE by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:01:34 +0000 |
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.5K bytes:
> ng0 <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Am I in the 'old system design' mindwset when I think that
> > every application that has applications such as libmicrohttpd
> > in its direct dependency chain should depend on the GnuTLS
> > version LMH uses and not the 'normal' GnuTLS
> > (It also depends on the features of GnuTLS which are being used,
> > but to be on the safe side)?
>
> You’re right, it’s a bad sign when there are two different variants of
> the same package in a reference graph.
>
> Ludo’.
I haven't read much (or at all?) into guix lint so far,
but can we lint for occurence of this pair somehow?
--
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://dl.n0.is/dist/keys/
WWW: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature