[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installation
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Installation |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:11:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0-alpha3; emacs 25.3.1 |
ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> Do we have the ability to separate features, like --enable-experimental passed
> to configure build Guix with certain features that might break your
> OS?
That would be too vague to be useful.
> Otoh
> we already presume that people setting up GuixSD today know enough about
> systems
> to recover from failures (which is another undocumented problem/usecase with
> GuixSD).
I don’t think that we do. There should not be failures that leave the
system broken. If there are then these are bugs and should be reported.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
Re: Installation, George myglc2 Clemmer, 2018/01/17
- Drive identifiers, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/01/18
- Re: Drive identifiers, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/01/18
- Re: Drive identifiers, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/01/18
- Re: Drive identifiers, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/01/18
- Re: Drive identifiers, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/01/19
Re: Drive identifiers, myglc2, 2018/01/18