[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels
From: |
宋文武 |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2018 13:45:30 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I’d like to retire GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH as the main way to get third-party
> packages, because we can’t really keep track of packages that were added
> or redefined in this way. I want to replace it with slightly more
> formal “channels”.
Hello, as a way to get and manage third-party guix repositories, it
sounds more like “overlays” (in Gentoo world) rather than “channels” (in
Nix world, to ensure binaries availability and updates stability) to me.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Overlay
https://nixos.org/nix/manual/index.html#sec-channels
How about call it as “overlay”?
- Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels, (continued)
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels, myglc2, 2018/01/23
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/01/23
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/01/23
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels,
宋文武 <=
Re: [RFC] A simple draft for channels, Chris Marusich, 2018/01/27