[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: my latest blog post
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: my latest blog post |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jun 2018 12:39:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Catonano <address@hidden> writes:
> Assuming that users read academic articles about programming languages in
> order to know your way aroung Guile is not reasonable
I fail to see how this follows from Guile’s lack of a macro stepper. To
be honest, I never even heard of a macro stepper before. And I have
never felt the need to read computer science papers to “know my way
around Guile”. (I have not studied computer science, so it isn’t that
my background allowed me to skip papers that are mandatory for other
users of Guile.)
The sentence above seems like an exaggeration to me.
(I say this with no hostility, just with surprise.)
> The monad accessing the daemon, how would I delve in it ?
The Guix manual should explain it fully, while assuming that the concept
of a monad is known (because that’s not a Guix or Guile invention). If
it fails to do that then the Guix manual should be updated.
--
Ricardo
Re: my latest blog post, Mark H Weaver, 2018/06/07
- Re: my latest blog post, Catonano, 2018/06/07
- Re: my latest blog post, Mark H Weaver, 2018/06/08
- Re: my latest blog post, Catonano, 2018/06/09
- Re: my latest blog post,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: my latest blog post, Catonano, 2018/06/09
- Re: my latest blog post, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/06/09
- Re: my latest blog post, Catonano, 2018/06/09
Re: my latest blog post, Mark H Weaver, 2018/06/10
Re: my latest blog post, Thorsten Wilms, 2018/06/07
Re: my latest blog post, Alex Vong, 2018/06/07
Re: my latest blog post, Julien Lepiller, 2018/06/08