[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnumaint changes
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: gnumaint changes |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:55:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 21:40:19 -0400, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> I'll have to look at what guix/gnu-maintenance.scm does, but:
[...]
> Rather than get rid of gnupackages.txt completely, I wrote a script last
> week to generate it from rec/gnupackages.rec. The formats are largely
> the same---it's possible that you can use the recfile directly.
> However, if you still need the old format, just run
> `make gnupackages.txt`.
Ah, I see, it fetches that single file over HTTP. Certainly running
`make` (or the underlying gawk script) is undesirable in that situation.
Can someone with more knowledge of what this is used for run a couple of
tests to see what is broken if you use rec/gnupackages.rec instead?
Worst case, I can commit gnupackages.txt until the script can be
updated, but I'd prefer to keep generated files out of the repository.
pkgblurbs.txt has also been replaced by rec/pkgblurbs.rec.
If anyone here also knows of any other external systems pulling from
womb, please lmk. I wasn't aware that anyone outside of maintainers@
used that repo, tbh.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
https://mikegerwitz.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature