[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:46:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> Is the bioconductor importer usable from `guix import` ?
>
> yes. You may encounter minor problems when using the recursive
> bioconductor importer, as it may try to look up CRAN packages on
> Bioconductor.
This is now fixed in commit 10a1cacb1. The importer will retry the
import from CRAN when the package cannot be found on Bioconductor.
So this works now:
./pre-inst-env guix import cran -a bioconductor -r flowCore
--
Ricardo
- bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/11
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/12
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/12
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/12
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Björn Höfling, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=