[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Jun 2019 18:53:53 +0200 |
Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> writes:
>> I was thinking of the Guix package definitions. In the long run,
>> assuming IPFS turns out to be reliable enough, we could put all source
>> into IPFS with a CID reference, rather then today's many ways to
>> download source files.
>
> There would be nothing special about it beside implementing an IPFS
> fetcher, or would it? Let me know if I misunderstood.
What's special about it is that it could replace all the other ones.
> Didn't know Radicle, it looks fantabulous! And... it uses (or plans to)
> a Scheme-based language! :)
Exactly.
> So you are saying that we could move the guix.git to a Radicle project,
> right?
Yes, assuming all that becomes stable at some point.
Konrad.
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/06/03
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Pronaip, 2019/06/03
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/06/03
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/06
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/06/06
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/06
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp,
Konrad Hinsen <=
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/06/07
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/06/07
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/06/07
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/06/07
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/06/07
- Re: Lightning talk at IPFS camp, ng0, 2019/06/13