[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on cabal revisions
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: on cabal revisions |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:28:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 |
Timothy Sample <address@hidden> writes:
>> I’ve been
>> wondering whether guile scales well with module size. It appears that
>> circular
>> imports between package modules are not a problem? Personally I’d like to
>> see the haskell compiler in a different module from hackage modules.
>
> We are moving towards this in general. The “guile.scm” and
> “guile-xyz.scm” split is a recent example of this.
Separating the compiler packages from the libraries and applications
written in the language is a goal. We need the work to be done for at
least Java and for Haskell.
--
Ricardo
- on cabal revisions, Robert Vollmert, 2019/06/11
- Re: on cabal revisions, Timothy Sample, 2019/06/12
- Re: on cabal revisions, Robert Vollmert, 2019/06/13
- Re: on cabal revisions, Timothy Sample, 2019/06/13
- Re: on cabal revisions, Robert Vollmert, 2019/06/14
- Re: on cabal revisions, Timothy Sample, 2019/06/14
- Re: on cabal revisions, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/06/14
- haskell package organization (Re: on cabal revisions), Robert Vollmert, 2019/06/16
- Re: on cabal revisions,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- reproducibility and bootstrapping in mid 2019 (was Re: on cabal revisions), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/06/15
Re: on cabal revisions, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/06/14