[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents)
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:51:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I have confirmed that this is the problem by replacing “while
>> (VMFile.exists(file.path))” with “while (false)”. The build doesn’t
>> fully complete then either, but it gets past the compilation of the Ant
>> source files. This clears JamVM and Jikes.
>
> It doesn’t.
>
> VMFile.exists always returns “true”, no matter what. The C part is
> fine, but the Java part is not, so I suspected the JVM to be at fault.
>
> I managed to build ant-bootstrap successfully with this patch: […]
Here’s a shorter patch:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
index 403c446a82..bd98784232 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/java.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm
@@ -152,6 +152,13 @@ and binary format defined in The Java Virtual Machine
Specification.")
"--disable-gjdoc")
#:phases
(modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (add-after 'unpack 'foo
+ (lambda _
+ (substitute* "native/jni/java-io/java_io_VMFile.c"
+ (("result = cpio_isFileExists.*" m)
+ (string-append m "
+//Without a long comment the Java side will return \"true\" on x86_64 all the
time.")))
+ #t))
(add-after 'install 'install-data
(lambda _ (invoke "make" "install-data"))))))
(native-inputs
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This only adds a comment. If the comment is too short it won’t work.
I suspected some misguided optimizations, so I built jamvm-1-bootstrap
and classpath-bootstrap with -O0, -O1, and I disabled stripping of
binaries, but to no avail.
Any ideas?
--
Ricardo
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents),
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Efraim Flashner, 2019/07/18
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/19
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Gábor Boskovits, 2019/07/19
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/19
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/19
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/20
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Julien Lepiller, 2019/07/20
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/20
- Re: bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/07/21