[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions regarding Python packaging
From: |
Tanguy LE CARROUR |
Subject: |
Re: Questions regarding Python packaging |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:37:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) |
Excerpts from Lars-Dominik Braun's message of January 5, 2021 11:25 am:
> Hi Tanguy,
>
>> So, I've tried packaging `python-keyring` with those two…
>>
>> `pep517` keeps on trying to download dependencies, which won't work.
>>
>> `build` crashes with "ZIP does not support timestamps before 1980",
>> which, I guess is related to the fact that everything in the store is
>> timestamped to January 1st 1970.
> have you been looking into a python-build-system using `build`[1]? I’ve
> had the same issue with egg versions set to 0.0.0 and think in the long
> run moving to a PEP 517-style build is the way forward.
Actually —and I almost forgot!—, Sébastien found a solution to our "0.0.0"
problem:
https://github.com/jaraco/keyring/issues/469#issuecomment-735695476
--
Tanguy
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2021/01/05
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2021/01/06
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2021/01/22
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2021/01/23
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2021/01/24
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Ryan Prior, 2021/01/24
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2021/01/25
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Ryan Prior, 2021/01/25
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2021/01/26
- Re: Questions regarding Python packaging, Maxim Cournoyer, 2021/01/26
Re: Questions regarding Python packaging,
Tanguy LE CARROUR <=