[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux]
From: |
Mathieu Othacehe |
Subject: |
Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux] |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:44:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
> The armhf-linux platform is in the worst shape, both on the master and
> staging branches. It's a shame because it's also the least powerful,
> with almost no hardware thermally capable of sustained CPU usage, so
> users will have the worst experience building packages for it.
>
> Does anyone want to work on it? Should we just "fix it on the master
> branch?"
Your weather summary is a great idea, thanks! As I said in my previous
email, the armhf substitutes are not built right now on the CI. It's
really sad but we have to make an impossible choice between:
* Trying to build everything on all architecture and have the CI that is
awfully lagging behind.
* Restrict the number of architecture we want to provide substitutes
for.
Thanks,
Mathieu
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability x86_64-linux], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability i686-linux], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux], Leo Famulari, 2021/01/15
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux], Vincent Legoll, 2021/01/16
- Re: Staging branch [substitute availability armhf-linux], Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/01/17