[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Oct 2022 18:00:07 +0000 |
Quick note:
On 1 October 2022 17:29:03 UTC, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>If substitutable was merely a hint that a daemon could be free to ignore
>it wouldn’t be any worse than downloading a substitute vs building
>something locally.
Substitutability has legal implications in Guix, whether or not it shouldn't.
Any 'suggestion' would have to be a third state. Just something to factor into
the decision.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <=
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/05
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/05
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, zimoun, 2022/10/07
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Mark H Weaver, 2022/10/07
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/10
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, zimoun, 2022/10/10
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/10