[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: advanced?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: advanced? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:44:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Thanks Liliana, zimoun, Ryan and Vagrant for feedback!
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Or if we do want to explain more, then perhaps we need a list of
> features that would also include things like Docker/VM image generation,
> declarative home environments, etc. But that’s broader topic.
Yes, that makes sense. I'm not the best person to summarize it, but
starting pointers if someone wants to take it further:
* Dedication to free software goals and the GNU community
* Shepherd init system written in Guile
* Declarative stateless system configurations
* Transactional upgrades and roll-backs
* Reproducible build environments
* Designed towards bootstrappable builds
Maybe this fits better directly in the Introduction section of the
manual? https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Introduction.html
> PS: For the record, the phrase “advanced distribution of the GNU system”
> was coined by RMS at a time where he insisted that this thing cannot
> be called “the GNU system”. All this makes little sense, even less
> so today, but if you’re curious you may enjoy Andreas’ entertaining
> talk: https://10years.guix.gnu.org/video/ten-years-of-failures/
Ah, thanks, the wording of that paragraph is more understandable now! I
can see how that wording came about, and also how it clarify compared to
the GNU system. I think this knowledge was the missing piece I didn't
have. As an introduction to what Guix is for someone without earlier
understanding of GNU etc, I still believe that the word 'advanced' does
not contribute though.
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature