[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾 |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:32:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
kiasoc5 <kiasoc5@disroot.org> skribis:
> We may wish to utilize multiple package outputs to a greater
> extent. Some Guix packages already have bin, doc, and lib outputs. We
> could make it a policy to split this for all packages.
There’s some a policy already, though maybe not universally followed;
see point 8 at
<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html>.
> I also wonder how much of the space is taken by debug output. Would
> making graft derivations substitutable help?
Graft derivations are not substitutable because it’s usually faster to
“build” them locally than to download them (it depends on package size,
hard disk performance, and network performance; my experience with an
SSD is that grafting is always faster than downloading, even over FTTH.)
Ludo’.
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, (continued)
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Grandfathering store paths considered harmful (was: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾), Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/18
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/01/20
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, kiasoc5, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, indieterminacy, 2023/01/18
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/20
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Efraim Flashner, 2023/01/17
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Simon Tournier, 2023/01/17
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Paul Jewell, 2023/01/18