[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Follow-up on julia import script
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: Follow-up on julia import script |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:25:38 +0100 |
Hi,
On lun., 27 févr. 2023 at 19:01, Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix
and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> wrote:
> That's what I meant, but it seems indeed impossible. In the hypothesis
> this juliahub script gets merged, what should we do? Really cloning the
> repository and getting it or rather just provide a given (false) hash?
Well, many importers are downloading the source for hashing it, so yes
it appears to me something the importer should do.
Moreover, cloning it would allow to extract various inputs /
propagated-inputs / native-inputs.
Thank you for pushing forward. :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Follow-up on julia import script, Nicolas Graves, 2023/02/24
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Simon Tournier, 2023/02/24
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Nicolas Graves, 2023/02/25
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Simon Tournier, 2023/02/25
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/02/25
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Simon Tournier, 2023/02/27
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Nicolas Graves, 2023/02/27
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Simon Tournier, 2023/02/27
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script, Nicolas Graves, 2023/02/27
- Re: Follow-up on julia import script,
Simon Tournier <=