Re: [swh-devel] Call for public review - SWH Nix/GNU Guix stack

[Timothy Sample]

Hello,

This is very exciting work, thanks everyone!

"Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont)" <ardumont@softwareheritage.org> writes:

> FWIW, in the "new" lister [1] implementation, there are a bunch of extra
> computations done [1] to try and resolve those situations. It's trying
> to fetch more information from upstream server (e.g. crates urls which
> ends in /download, ...) now. It's probably not exhaustive though.
>
> [1] 
> https://gitlab.softwareheritage.org/swh/devel/swh-lister/-/blob/master/swh/lister/nixguix/lister.py?ref_type=heads

I was just looking over some of the new results and noticed that crates
are being treated as ‘content’ rather than ‘tarball-directory’.  E.g.:

https://webapp.staging.swh.network/browse/content/sha1_git:e05b33b2d3b40254ceaaa5fe4c501d1b15c75ea6/?origin_url=https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/diff/0.1.12/download

Is that because the changes you describe were done after the staging
data was loaded or is it a bug?


-- Tim