[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Guix-europe-sac] Shutting down qa.guix?
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: [Guix-europe-sac] Shutting down qa.guix? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:57:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 |
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
> Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:54:59AM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> I think this underlines a collective failure to get our act together.
>
> indeed, and besides what Simon mentioned about the bank situation I think
> there was a certain lack of consistency between deciding on the technical
> and on the financial questions. And of course the lack of urgency, since
> anyway things continued thanks to Chris... So thank you for all you have
> done, Chris, and thank you for taking action now to force us to get our act
> together! Indeed QA has become a central part of our project infrastructure.
>
> I suggest the following, which resolves the lockstep between technology and
> finance:
> - Decide that the funds at the FSF pay for the hosting in its current form.
> Ideally move the billing to Guix Foundation, and then, as we use to do
> for bayfront, periodically ask the FSF to reimburse the hosting cost.
> I think we have an informal consensus for this, and just require a formal
> vote at the Guix spending committee and at the Guix Foundation SAC.
> - Reimburse Chris for the costs incurred for hosting before this move.
> As Simon has said, we have a vote for this already, but could also
> start over with the exact amount once the first point is handled, so
> that Chris does not pay for future hosting any more.
>
> Then in a separate step, other people can discuss about potential
> technical changes to the hosting situation. It would probably be good
> to have a small group of people, including Chris at least for a
> transitory period, who take care of the sysadmin part.
>
> Any thoughts on this proposal?
Sounds good to me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature