[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No default OpenJDK version?
|
From: |
Attila Lendvai |
|
Subject: |
Re: No default OpenJDK version? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:03:42 +0000 |
> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build
> system (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still
> have quite a lot of old packages that don't build with openjdk9, so
> I'm not sure when we can update the default jdk…
does that prevent the introduction of a newer default JDK and annotating the
old java dependency on the (hopefully few) packages that fail to build with a
newer default?
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Malthus was right. It's hard to see how the solar system could support much
more than 10^28 people or the universe more than 10^50.”
— John McCarthy (1927–2011), father of Lisp