[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?
|
From: |
Fabio Natali |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:29:17 +0100 |
On 2024-04-20, 11:06 +0100, Fabio Natali <me@fabionatali.com> wrote:
> I'll send an update here.
Hi Maxim,
There's a couple of mentions of 'nss-certs' in the manual that might be
rephrased to reflect '65e8472a4b6fc6f66871ba0dad518b7d4c63595e'.
For what it's worth, I put together a micro-patch and sent it over as a
follow-up to #70451.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70451#4
Thanks, cheers, Fabio.
--
Fabio Natali
https://fabionatali.com
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, (continued)
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, Jan Wielkiewicz, 2024/04/05
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, Richard Sent, 2024/04/08
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/04/10
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, Clément Lassieur, 2024/04/23
- Re: Should we include nss-certs out of the box?, Fabio Natali, 2024/04/18