[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Guile CSE elimination of record accessor?
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Guile CSE elimination of record accessor? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:04:44 +0200 |
Hi,
In Guile module (ice-9 vlist), one reads:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;; Asserting that something is a vlist is actually a win if your next
;; step is to call record accessors, because that causes CSE to
;; eliminate the type checks in those accessors.
;;
(define-inlinable (assert-vlist val)
(unless (vlist? val)
(throw 'wrong-type-arg
#f
"Not a vlist: ~S"
(list val)
(list val))))
[...]
(define (vlist-head vlist)
"Return the head of VLIST."
(assert-vlist vlist)
(let ((base (vlist-base vlist))
(offset (vlist-offset vlist)))
(block-ref (block-content base) offset)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Other said, the argument ’vlist’ is “type-checked” with ’assert-vlist’
and thus that is exploited by Guile compiler, if I understand correctly
the comment.
The first question is: is it still correct? Because this module had
been implemented before many Guile compiler improvements.
The second question, if the comment above is still valid, is: could we
also “win” for some record inside Guix source code?
Concretely, one example about the record <package>, there is some
procedures such that:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define* (package->manifest-entry package #:optional (output "out")
#:key (parent (delay #f))
(properties (default-properties package)))
"Return a manifest entry for the OUTPUT of package PACKAGE."
;; For each dependency, keep a promise pointing to its "parent" entry.
(letrec* ((deps (map (match-lambda
((label package)
(package->manifest-entry package
#:parent (delay entry)))
((label package output)
(package->manifest-entry package output
#:parent (delay entry))))
(package-propagated-inputs package)))
(entry (manifest-entry
(name (package-name package))
(version (package-version package))
(output output)
(item package)
(dependencies (delete-duplicates deps))
(search-paths
(package-transitive-native-search-paths package))
(parent parent)
(properties properties))))
entry))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
which fits the comment above: a record as argument and record accessor
call.
And that could also be applied to other records, I guess.
Any answers, explanations or references are very welcome. :-)
Cheers,
simon
PS: Raining day and weird pastime… diving into Guile source code. ;-)
- Guile CSE elimination of record accessor?,
Simon Tournier <=