Re: Rebuilding a package after removing a build step

[Konrad Hinsen]

Hi Andreas,

>> It looks like Guix picked the larger one by
>> alphanumeric order, which is not a reasonable choice in a development
>> context.
>
> This is exactly the role of the number "-0." in front of the git commit;
> one needs to specify by hand the order of the (non-)releases, as coming

Good to know, thanks! I had been wondering what those revision numbers
were good for.

Manual ordering looks fine for updating packages in a given channel. But
in this case, the two versions come from different channels. It's a bit
hard to globally coordinate manual revision numbers across all possible
channels!

Cheers,
  Konrad.