[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On the "next" packages, and packaging confusion.
From: |
Sharlatan Hellseher |
Subject: |
On the "next" packages, and packaging confusion. |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:34:24 +0000 |
Hi Divya,
Speaking from Python/Golang/Astro teams perspective.
I see and use *-next where I need the latest package version but
updating inherited one would trigger a large amount of re-builds. It may
be swap on dedicated team branch when more packages start needing it.
In Golang, there are breaking changes versions which are specified in
module path and reflected in Guix' package names e.g.
go-github-com-<owner>-<project>-v2
If updating package does not trigger more than 300-400 related packages
there is not need to introduce *-next variant and it's reasonable just to
update to the latest version.
Hope it helps
Live well!
--
Oleg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature