[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers
From: |
45mg |
Subject: |
Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Feb 2025 05:33:11 +0000 |
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> In my view, running forks is a strength for Guix. I will soon propose a
> way to do it with authenticated commits.
Oooh. Would this be similar in scope or design to my current
implementation [1]? If it is, I might as well hold off on writing the
GCD for it until you propose your idea đź‘€. Or are you talking about
something else entirely?
In either case, can't wait to hear about it!
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75981#6
- Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Ludovic Courtès, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Gábor Boskovits, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Felix Lechner, 2025/02/07
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers,
45mg <=
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Felix Lechner, 2025/02/08
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, 45mg, 2025/02/09
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Felix Lechner, 2025/02/09
- Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, 45mg, 2025/02/10
- Securing personal forks (Was: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers), Felix Lechner, 2025/02/11
- Re: Securing personal forks (Was: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers), Murilo, 2025/02/12
Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2025/02/07
Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers, Ian Eure, 2025/02/08