[bug#36411] [PATCH] gnu: Add libresprite.

[swedebugia]

On 2019-06-28 16:05, Jakob L. Kreuze wrote:
> swedebugia <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Why not a release? Please ask upstream to release.
>
> Will do. I agree, looking at their roadmap, the current state of the
> repository is ripe for a release.
>
> > I see these:
> > Submodule 'third_party/duktape' (https://github.com/aseprite/duktape.git)
> > registered for path 'third_party/duktape'
> > Submodule 'third_party/freetype2' (https://github.com/aseprite/freetype2.git)
> > registered for path 'third_party/freetype2'
> > Submodule 'third_party/gtest' (https://github.com/aseprite/gtest.git) registered
> > for path 'third_party/gtest'
> > Submodule 'third_party/libpng' (https://github.com/aseprite/libpng.git)
> > registered for path 'third_party/libpng'
> > Submodule 'third_party/libwebp' (https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libwebp)
> > registered for path 'third_party/libwebp'
> > Submodule 'third_party/pixman' (https://github.com/aseprite/pixman.git)
> > registered for path 'third_party/pixman'
> > Submodule 'third_party/simpleini' (https://github.com/aseprite/simpleini.git)
> > registered for path 'third_party/simpleini'
> > Submodule 'third_party/zlib' (https://github.com/aseprite/zlib.git) registered
> > for path 'third_party/zlib'
> >
> > Please unbundle as many as possible.
>
> The bundled libraries is an issue with 'aseprite' as well. I'll see
> about submitting a separate patch to resolve it there.

+1

> > Synopsis?
>
> Inherited from 'aseprite'. Should I alter it to mention that it's a fork
> of Aseprite?

Yeah, I think that would be preferable. We/I normally ad that as an 
aside in the end of the description "xx is a fork of yy". :)


--
Cheers Swedebugia