[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#55653] [PATCH] guix: Add syntactic sugar for profile generation.
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
[bug#55653] [PATCH] guix: Add syntactic sugar for profile generation. |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2022 22:34:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 01-06-2022 om 22:15 [+0200]:
> not to mention that changes which
> break record ABI (such as added fields) get promoted directly through
> syntax but not through a plain procedure.
Using a procedure instead of the record construction macro would make
the ABI stable (*). ABI-wise, wouldn't a stable ABI (regular
procudure) be better than an unstable ABI? There might be some
benefits for a macro concerning readability or such, but I don't see
any benefits ABI-wise.
(*) assuming no inlining.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part