guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#55813: autogen: Use guile-3.0


From: Vagrant Cascadian
Subject: bug#55813: autogen: Use guile-3.0
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:02:51 -0700

On 2022-06-10, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org> skribis:
>
>> Some relatively simply patches make autogen build with guile-3.0. Used
>> by both Debian an openSUSE, so already has a bit of field testing.
>>
>> I'm not 100% sure that it wasn't just dumb luck, but it seemed like
>> building autogen with guile-3.0 was more likely to build reproducibly.
>
> Nice.  :-)
>
>> It did require adding automake and autoconf to inputs, seeming to detect
>> that something changed since configure was generated. Not sure if that
>> could be avoided by being cleverer, or if that is an acceptible change.
>
> It could be avoided by changing just ‘configure’ (which this patch
> already does actually), but it’s fine either way.

Ah, that seems simpler, at least...

>> From 9745d65234b70115a07d324f5514b125ad97369a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>
>> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 16:05:02 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: autogen: Build with guile 3.0.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/autogen.scm (autogen)[arguments]: Add 'support-guile-3.0 
>> phase.
>>   [inputs]: Remove guile-2.2 and add automake, autoconf and guile-3.0.
>
> [...]
>
>> +             (substitute*
>> +                 "agen5/guile-iface.h"
>
> You can move that string to the previous line.

Done.

>> +             (substitute*
>> +                 (list
>> +                  "configure"
>> +                  "config/guile.m4")
>> +               (("2.2 2.0 1.8") "3.0 2.2 2.0 1.8"))))
>
> Here you should either modify ‘config/guile.m4’, in which case
> ‘autoreconf’ will have to run (that should be automatic), or modify
> ‘configure’, in which case the dependency on Autotools is unnecessary.
>
> The latter is a fine solution.

Ok, that seems like a smaller change, and still works, so went with that.

> OK with a change along these lines!

Thanks for the review!

Pushed as 3691e37eb14c5871d213646154b98f5aaa5dd2f1.


live well,
  vagrant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]