[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#68386] [PATCH v1] gnu: Add emacs-vhdl-mode.
|
From: |
Cayetano Santos |
|
Subject: |
[bug#68386] [PATCH v1] gnu: Add emacs-vhdl-mode. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:11:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 29.1 |
>mer. 17 janv. 2024 at 09:08, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cayetano Santos <csantosb@inventati.org> writes:
>
>>>dim. 14 janv. 2024 at 21:46, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>> Since there already is a 'vhdl-mode' package shipped with Emacs, I think
>>> it's important to describe how this one differs (what improvements,
>>> features,
>>> refinements, etc. does it provide that would make it worth considering
>>> it instead of the default Emacs-provided option?).
>>
>> There are also many other packages (org, modus-themes, etc.) shipped with
>> Emacs that we package in its most recent versions (and many others that
>> pull these as propagated inputs, for some reason, even when already
>> available with Emacs). Do we also describe how they differ ?
>>
>> Anyway, the release notes, update history, bug fixes and enhancements of
>> every single version of vhdl-mode are given in the project home page,
>> already included along with the package. Where do we need to replicate
>> this information exactly for the patch to be accepted ?
>
> Oh, I hadn't noticed that this was the very same package that comes with
> Emacs. I guess it's fine then, but to avoid any misunderstanding,
> perhaps the description text could mention it explicitly ("This is the
> same @code{vhdl-mode} that comes with Emacs, albeit it may be newer") or
> similar wording.
Done.
As an aside note, at some point, it should be decided how do we handle newest
releases of packages already included with emacs: do we need to mention
it explicitly or something else ?
C.
[bug#68386] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add emacs-vhdl-mode., Cayetano Santos, 2024/01/17