[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#73073] [PATCH 4/6] gnu: gnome-recipes: Move libgd origin from phase
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
[bug#73073] [PATCH 4/6] gnu: gnome-recipes: Move libgd origin from phases to native-inputs. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2024 19:33:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.4 |
Am Freitag, dem 06.09.2024 um 17:54 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> * gnu/packages/dlang.scm (gnome-recipes)[arguments]<phases>: Move
> libgd
> origin from here...
> [native-inputs]: ...to here.
>
> Change-Id: I137dc41819a680fdf1f5c0bea9778b2bceae3fad
> ---
> gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> index 7339000436..8ae9fb0656 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> @@ -799,15 +799,7 @@ (define-public gnome-recipes
> (add-after 'unpack 'unpack-libgd
> (lambda _
> (copy-recursively
> - #$(origin
> - (method git-fetch)
> - (uri (git-reference
> - (url
> "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd")
> - (commit
> "c7c7ff4e05d3fe82854219091cf116cce6b19de0")))
> - (file-name (git-file-name "libgd" version))
> - (sha256
> - (base32
> -
> "16yld0ap7qj1n96h4f2sqkjmibg7xx5xwkqxdfzam2nmyfdlrrrs")))
> + #$(this-package-native-input "libgd")
> "subprojects/libgd"))))))
> (inputs (list glib
> gnome-autoar
> @@ -823,7 +815,17 @@ (define-public gnome-recipes
> `(,glib "bin")
> itstool
> pkg-config
> - python))
> + python
> + `("libgd"
> + ,(origin
> + (method git-fetch)
> + (uri (git-reference
> + (url
> "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd")
> + (commit
> "c7c7ff4e05d3fe82854219091cf116cce6b19de0")))
> + (file-name (git-file-name "libgd"
> version))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
I can see why you're doing that, but I'm not really convinced it helps
the package. Particularly, we're now even adding a labeled input,
which makes for a cursed situation where all but one inputs are
unlabeled¹.
IMHO, G-Expressions in phases serve in part to facilitate uses like
this. They may not be nice, but those are upstream conditions we have
to cope with. I'd rather do a proper unbundling of libgd.
Another "proper" solution could be as easy as using an unlabeled origin
and search-input-file. However, this doesn't really work all that well
if you have to unpack the entire origin, hence what I've done here for
gnome-recipes.
Cheers
¹ Let's not even mention the necessity of 1/6 to enable that. Back in
the day, there was a decision against giving origins labels because it
would add to the further propagation of label use throughout Guix,
while we want to drop them.
[bug#73073] [PATCH 5/6] gnu: farstream: Move common origin from phases to native-inputs., Simon Tournier, 2024/09/06
[bug#73073] [PATCH 6/6] gnu: gnulib: Move phobos origin from phases to native-inputs., Simon Tournier, 2024/09/06
[bug#73073] [PATCH 1/6] guix: packages: Allow origin with label as inputs., Simon Tournier, 2024/09/06
[bug#73073] [PATCH 0/6] Allow origin with label as inputs., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/09/06