[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#73137] this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definiti
From: |
Andy Tai |
Subject: |
[bug#73137] this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:51:13 -0700 |
OK I don't know if this is "implementation detail" or a bug, or is as
intended, that
>considering the current implementation, you cannot reach the propagated-inputs
>of the inputs using this-package-inputs.
(seems like a bug to me)
Also, would the same package be in the input list and the
propagated-input list be a problem?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:24 AM Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had to add freefont as input to ddd to make this work.
>
> BTW, for the package ddd, is freetype an input or also a
> propagated-input ?