[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process. |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:42:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Noé,
Thanks for this new version.
Noé Lopez <noe@noé.eu> skribis:
> +### Submission (up to 7 days)
> +
> +The author submits their RFC proposal as a regular patch and look for
> +co-supporter(s). See “Co-supporter” section.
> +
> +Once the RFC is co-supported, it marks the start of a discussion period.
[...]
> +### Last call (up to 14 days)
> +
> +The author publishes a final version of the RFC and a last grace period
> +of 14 days is granted. People are asked to agree or disagree by
> +commenting:
> +
> +- +1 / LGTM: I support
> +- =0 / LGTM: I will live with it
> +- -1: I disagree with this proposal
> +
> +At least half of people with commit access must express their voice with
> +the keys above during this last call. We need to be sure that the RFC
> +had been read by people committed to take care of the project, since it
> +proposes an important change.
> +
> +When a positive consensus is reached, the RFC becomes effective. If not,
> +the proposal is archived and the status quo continues.
It seems unchanged compared to v3. WDYT of my comments, suggestions,
and proposed wording:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#9
?
I think we should now make sure we reach consensus on the timeline, and
in particular:
1. on the voting process;
2. on the submission -> withdrawn transition, in case nobody supports
the RFC.
Once we have that, we can fine-tune the language and hopefully be done
within a couple of weeks.
I like the Dot graph you submitted! Here’s an updated version, with a
new submission -> withdrawn arrow (as proposed in the comment above) and
with hopefully clearer names (in particular “Voting Period” rather than
“Last call”):
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
digraph "RFC Timeline" {
submission[label=<Submission Period<br />7 days>]
comments[label=<Discussion Period<br />30–60 days>]
last_call[label=<Voting Period<br />14 days>]
withdrawn[label=Withdrawn, shape=rectangle]
final[label=Final, shape=rectangle]
submission -> comments
submission -> withdrawn
comments -> last_call
last_call -> withdrawn
last_call -> final
withdrawn -> submission [label="New version"]
comments -> withdrawn
}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Thoughts?
Thanks for getting the ball rolling!
Ludo’.
- [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process., (continued)
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process., Artyom V. Poptsov, 2024/12/09
[bug#74736] [PATCH v3] rfc: Add Request-For-Comment process., Simon Tournier, 2024/12/12
[bug#74736] [PATCH v4 0/1] rfc: Add Request-For-Comment process., Noé Lopez, 2024/12/22
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process., Noé Lopez, 2024/12/29
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process., Ludovic Courtès, 2024/12/30
[bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process., Noé Lopez, 2024/12/30