[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we actually need a “packages” field?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Do we actually need a “packages” field? |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2020 13:06:24 +0100 |
Hi Ricardo,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 11:39, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> What do you think?
Well, considering Mercurial, does it become?
-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
process: fetch-data
[...]
#{mercurial}/bin/hg clone {{inputs}} {{outputs}}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I am not sure it is more readable.
Moreover the user has to know the path.
Even I am not sure to understand why you want to change, from my
opinion, and based on my user experience, it does not matter where I
have to provide the package name but the issue is to find the name of
the package (and the module even if specification->package and related
help).
Cheers,
simon